<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: pamplet</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/pamplet/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:53:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>CA: Opponents of teen abortion measure sue over pamphlet language (Prop 73)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1458044/posts</link>
<description>SAN FRANCISCO - Opponents and supporters of a proposed constitutional amendment requiring parental notification before doctors can perform abortions on minors have filed lawsuits challenging statements that the other side provided for the state&#x26;#x27;s voter guide. The lawsuits, filed in Sacramento Superior Court by Proposition 73&#x26;#x27;s sponsors and by a pro-abortion rights group called Campaign for Teen Safety, specifically take aim at the rebuttal arguments the opposing group submitted for the upcoming ballot guide. In it, each group offers its view of the ballot initiative&#x26;#x27;s potential impact. The legal tit-for-tat is just the beginning of what promises to be one...</description>
<author>AP on Monterey Herald</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1458044/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Aug 2005 04:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>