<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: occupationnarrative</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/occupationnarrative/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:58:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Yuge: Trumpless Debate Earns Higher Ratings Than Last GOP Debate That Included Trump</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3390442/posts</link>
<description>That headline is technically accurate: Last night&#x26;#x27;s Trump-free Fox News forum pulled in roughly&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;12-13 million viewers, better than the 11 million or so who watched the Fox Business debate earlier this month, at which The Donald stood center stage.&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;Trump out, ratings up! &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;Well, sort of.&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0; The Des Moines debate was still the second-least watched GOP debate of the cycle (maybe&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;third-least, including online live streams), and many Trump fans -- suddenly highly&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;interested in nuance in context --&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;are pointing out that&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;the lowest-rated one aired on FBN, which has a smaller footprint than Fox News or CNN nationwide. &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;True enough,&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#xA0;although FBN&#x26;#x27;s November debate...</description>
<author>Townhall.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3390442/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>