<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: nothypocrisy</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/nothypocrisy/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026 05:19:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Why did William Wilberforce defend abolitionists who decided to continue personal slave ownership through their fight for abolition? Why did he insist this is not a form of hypocrisy?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4394303/posts</link>
<description>The following is the full question I asked: &#x26;#x22;In his book &#x26;#x22;A letter on the abolition of the slave trade&#x26;#x22;, why did William Wilberforce defend abolitionists, though not excuse abolitionists, who decided to continue personal slave ownership through their fight for abolition? Why did he insist this is not a form of hypocrisy?&#x26;#x22; Response:Yes. The key is that Wilberforce is making a distinction between opposing the slave trade and immediately abolishing slavery itself. That distinction can seem morally uncomfortable to a modern reader, but it is central to his argument.What Wilberforce was defendingIn A Letter on the Abolition of the...</description>
<author>ChatGPT</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4394303/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Sep 2026 05:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>