<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: notableandquotable</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/notableandquotable/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:43:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>in a message issued by the Diocese of Sioux City (The Church on Universal Healthcare)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2330728/posts</link>
<description>Unlike a prudential concern like national defense, for which government monopolization is objectively good&#x26;#x2014;it both limits violence overall and prevents the obvious abuses to which private armies are susceptible&#x26;#x2014;health care should not be subject to federal monopolization. Preserving patient choice (through a flourishing private sector) is the only way to prevent a health care monopoly from denying care arbitrarily, as we learned from HMOs in the recent past. While a government monopoly would not be motivated by profit, it would be motivated by such bureaucratic standards as quotas and defined &#x26;#x22;best procedures,&#x26;#x22; which are equally beyond the influence of most...</description>
<author>Wall Street Journal</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2330728/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>