<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: noachianflood</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/noachianflood/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:43:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Here&#x26;#x2019;s why the Durupinar Formation is the most compelling location of Noah&#x26;#x2019;s Ark: 1) Virtually the EXACT same length 2) 26 Drogue (boat anchor) stones found in vicinity 3) Located in the EXACT place described in the Bible </title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4396468/posts</link>
<description>Jimmy Corsetti@BrightInsight6&#x26;#xB7;1hHere&#x26;#x2019;s why the Durupinar Formation is the most compelling location of Noah&#x26;#x2019;s Ark:1) Virtually the EXACT same length2) 26 Drogue (boat anchor) stones found in vicinity3) Located in the EXACT place described in the Bible&#x26;#x1F4CD;WHY Archaeologists are SO against it:1) It would validate the Bible2) Confirmation of the Great Flood and/or Noah&#x26;#x2019;s Ark would require Textbooks to be completely rewritten3) Countless archaeologists, historians, professors, and so-called &#x26;#x201C;experts&#x26;#x201D; will permanently lose all credibilityThey desperately want this to be debunked.The most comprehensive Scientific testing of this site is at last underway, the results haven&#x26;#x2019;t even been published. YET, the naysayers are...</description>
<author>X.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4396468/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>