<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: moralfog</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/moralfog/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:32:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Jacoby: Preserving our moral clarity</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/749195/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;YEAR AND a day later, it is striking how quickly the moral clarity that followed the attacks was beset by moral confusion.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;Not everywhere, of course. This time around, The New York Times did not mark Sept. 11 with a celebration of terrorism - as opposed to Sept. 11, 2001, when the front of the paper&#x26;#x27;s Arts section featured an affectionate profile of former Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers. &#x26;#x27;&#x26;#x27;He still has the ebullient, ingratiating manner ... that made him a charismatic figure in the radical student movement,&#x26;#x27;&#x26;#x27; reporter Dinitia Smith bubbled. These days, the Times takes a different view of terrorists.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>Boston Globe</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/749195/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>