<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: mooreknew</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/mooreknew/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:14:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Moore defends incendiary film (and flops doing so)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1156538/posts</link>
<description>Matt Lauer: &#x26;#x22;The White House communications director said of your film, it is so outrageously false it&#x26;#x27;s not even worth commenting. The 41st President of the United States, the president&#x26;#x27;s father, called you, I think you probably heard this, a slime ball.&#x26;#x22; Michael Moore: &#x26;#x22;Have they seen it? Have they seen the film? No. Of course they haven&#x26;#x27;t. I will tell you they haven&#x26;#x27;t seen it. These are un-credible reviews from people who haven&#x26;#x27;t even seen the movie.&#x26;#x22; The film is &#x26;#x22;Fahrenheit 9/11,&#x26;#x22; and as the title suggests, it&#x26;#x27;s meant to be incendiary. Filmmaker Michael Moore serves up a scathing...</description>
<author>Dateline NBC</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1156538/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>