<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: liberalwusses</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/liberalwusses/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:22:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>How did Newsweek get Sarah Palin to pose with a rifle?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100919/posts</link>
<description>How did Newsweek convince Gov. Sarah Palin to pose with a rifle for its cover? Simple. It didn&#x26;#x27;t. Instead, it used an archive (fancy speak for old) stock photo of her taken back in June 2002 and used it for the cover without her knowledge. However, to the magazine&#x26;#x27;s credit, it did not try to hide the fact that it&#x26;#x27;s a stock photo, even printing circa 2002 on the cover and again referencing the date in editor Jon Meacham&#x26;#x27;s letter entitled &#x26;#x22;The Palin Problem.&#x26;#x22; So that makes it OK. Right? Or maybe not? What do you think? Hey, is that...</description>
<author>LA Times</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2100919/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>