<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: leonardburman</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/leonardburman/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:29:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The staggering cost of Elizabeth Warren&#x26;#x2019;s plans</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3788947/posts</link>
<description>Elizabeth Warren has a plan for everything. Some of those plans are expensive. With Warren emerging as a front-runner in the Democratic presidential contest, Yahoo Finance tallied the cost of her plans. Altogether, the Massachusetts senator&#x26;#x2019;s agenda would require $4.2 trillion per year in new federal spending, and a like amount in new taxes, if she paid for everything without issuing new debt. The federal government currently spends about $4.4 trillion per year, so Warren&#x26;#x2019;s plans would nearly double federal spending. The Treasury takes in about $3.4 trillion in tax revenue each year, so if Warren levied new taxes to...</description>
<author>Yahoo News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3788947/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The eye-popping cost of Medicare for All (the Fauxcahontas $34 trillion wet dream)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3786738/posts</link>
<description>Sen. Elizabeth Warren&#x26;#x2019;s refusal to answer repeated questions at Tuesday night&#x26;#x2019;s debate about how she would fund Medicare for All underscores the challenge she faces finding a politically acceptable means to meet the idea&#x26;#x2019;s huge price tag &#x26;#x2014; a challenge that only intensified today with the release of an eye-popping new study. The Urban Institute, a center-left think tank highly respected among Democrats, is projecting that a plan similar to what Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders are pushing would require $34 trillion in additional federal spending over its first decade in operation. That&#x26;#x2019;s more than the federal government&#x26;#x2019;s total cost...</description>
<author>The Atlantic via MSN</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3786738/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 01:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>