<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: kunoichi</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/kunoichi/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 7 May 2026 00:18:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Did Japan have female samurai?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4378027/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Any woman born in the samurai status group was a &#x26;#x27;female samurai&#x26;#x27; even if she never picked up a weapon, just as any man born into that status group was a samurai, no matter how wimpy/untrained/etc. he may have been,&#x26;#x22; Sean O&#x26;#x27;Reilly, a professor of Japan studies at Akita International University, told Live Science in an email.It&#x26;#x27;s unclear how often female samurai fought in battle, however. Women who fought in battle are sometimes called &#x26;#x22;onna-musha,&#x26;#x22; which translates to &#x26;#x22;women warriors.&#x26;#x22;&#x26;#x22;I must say, as an historian, that onnamusha -- female warriors -- were probably not as frequent or as militarily significant...</description>
<author>Livescience</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4378027/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 May 2026 00:18:34 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>