<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: kayladmcclusky</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/kayladmcclusky/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:48:41 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Judge Clears Path for Fresh Evidence in Explosive Social Media Censorship Lawsuit Against Biden Administration [Missouri v. Biden]</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4277235/posts</link>
<description>The Western District of Louisiana&#x26;#x2019;s US District Court has ruled in favor of the State of Missouri, allowing additional discovery in the significant Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, which scrutinizes government collaboration in social media censorship. This decision comes after the Supreme Court, in June, overturned a prior injunction, then-named Murthy v. Missouri, which had prohibited entities including the White House, CDC, FBI, CISA, and the Surgeon General&#x26;#x2019;s office from pressing social media platforms to suppress speech protected under the Constitution. [link to Court&#x26;#x27;s Order] [snip] The depth of the Biden Administration&#x26;#x2019;s involvement in these censorial activities likely would have remained...</description>
<author>ReClaim the Net</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4277235/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Judge in Missouri v Biden ain&#x26;#x27;t buying what the government&#x26;#x27;s shoveling</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4158320/posts</link>
<description>Ooooh, this is turning out to be such a good show. Before I get into the latest, let&#x26;#x2019;s recap quickly, shall we? The Missouri v Biden lawsuit sprang from underhanded censorship dealings the Biden administration began with the social media companies almost the second they ascended to the throne. Literally 3 days after Biden took office, the government&#x26;#x2019;s censorship operation was flying. The White House immediately launched a pressure campaign on social media platforms to suppress supposed &#x26;#x201C;COVID misinformation.&#x26;#x201D; The Surgeon General launched his signature &#x26;#x201C;disinformation&#x26;#x201D; initiative at a Virality Project event at the Stanford Internet Observatory. And, Biden himself...</description>
<author>Hot Air</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4158320/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jun 2023 18:53:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Religious Objections To Medical College&#x26;#x27;s COVID Vaccination Requirement Upheld </title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3988905/posts</link>
<description>In Magliulo v. Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, ((WD LA, Aug. 17, 2021), a Louisiana federal district court issued a temporary restraining order barring a medical college from conditioning plaintiff students&#x26;#x27; enrollment on their receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. The students had requested an exemption from the college&#x26;#x27;s requirements for religious reasons-- they believed the vaccine was derived from aborted fetal tissue. The college would grant the exemption only if the objecting students complied with extensive restrictions. The court held that Louisiana statutes allow students to assert religious or philosophical objections to the vaccine requirement. It also concluded that the...</description>
<author>Religion Clause</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3988905/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>