<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: janusunion</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/janusunion/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:50:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>New challenge to union power brewing in wake of Janus ruling</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3806876/posts</link>
<description>In the wake of a 2018 Supreme Court ruling that public-sector unions cannot force non-members to pay a fee for workplace representation, a new challenge to union power is taking shape. The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Janus v. AFSCME that unions could not extract what&#x26;#x2019;s called an &#x26;#x201C;agency fee&#x26;#x201D; from non-members who happened to work in the same place a union had &#x26;#x201C;exclusive representation&#x26;#x201D; rights. But one group argues that in saying it was unconstitutional to force people to fund labor unions&#x26;#x2019; speech with their own money, the high court also indicated that the legitimacy of &#x26;#x201C;exclusive...</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3806876/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>