<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: intellientdesign</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/intellientdesign/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 03:26:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Where&#x26;#x2019;s the Dialogue? (Theistic Evos OK with &#x26;#x22;dialogue&#x26;#x22; in theory, but NOT IN PRACTICE)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2264353/posts</link>
<description>When talking with friendly journalists, theistic evolution proponent Francis Collins typically insists that he wants to initiate a &#x26;#x201C;dialogue&#x26;#x201D; about faith and evolution. But Collins and his colleagues at the Biologos Foundation seem curiously averse to engaging in real dialogue. A case in point is a cranky blog entry posted this week by theistic evolutionist Karl Giberson, Francis Collins&#x26;#x2019; colleague at Biologos. Giberson, whom I debated at Biola University a few months ago, denounces Discovery Institute&#x26;#x2019;s new Faith and Evolution website as &#x26;#x201C;slick, well-resourced, rhetorically clever, profoundly misleading, and almost completely devoid of any real science.&#x26;#x201D; Whew! Giberson&#x26;#x2019;s own post...</description>
<author>Discovery Institute</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2264353/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 03:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>