<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: infrastacture</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/infrastacture/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 11:41:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Trump&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x27;Infrastructure&#x26;#x27; Plan Versus Obama&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x27;Stimulus&#x26;#x27;: Part II</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3749669/posts</link>
<description>My previous column objected to President Donald Trump and Sen. Chuck Schumer&#x26;#x27;s, D-N.Y., proposed $2 trillion &#x26;#x22;infrastructure&#x26;#x22; spending. As with President Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;stimulus,&#x26;#x22; the Trump-Schumer plan violates the concept of federalism and bails out states that spend irresponsibly, guaranteeing a future of continued irresponsible behavior by state and local governments. But several of my column&#x26;#x27;s readers insisted that Trump -- a builder and shrewd negotiator -- plans to spend more efficiently and effectively than Obama did under his $787 billion so-called stimulus plan. Respected lawyer and columnist John Hinderaker, for example, wrote: &#x26;#x22;I disagree: Obama&#x26;#x27;s faux stimulus consisted largely...</description>
<author>Townhall.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3749669/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 11:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>