<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: howboutaveto</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/howboutaveto/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:42:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>For Libertarians, Candidates Offer Little Choice</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1252243/posts</link>
<description>Like most &#x26;#x22;small L&#x26;#x22; libertarians, I&#x26;#x27;d like to see a constitutionally limited government, a humble but formidable foreign policy, unfettered free markets, and a premium on personal freedom. Which is why I tend to get despondent around Election Day, and am again this year stuck with the classic &#x26;#x22;lesser of two evils&#x26;#x22; dilemma. The problem is that it&#x26;#x27;s getting more and more difficult to discern which &#x26;#x22;evil&#x26;#x22; is lesser. Let&#x26;#x27;s look first at the incumbent. From a libertarian perspective, the case against re-electing President Bush is extensive. The Cliff&#x26;#x27;s Notes version: President Bush has grown government more than any administration...</description>
<author>Fox News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1252243/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>