<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: hothand</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/hothand/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:08:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Randomness isn&#x26;#x2019;t in charge of anything: the &#x26;#x201C;hot hand&#x26;#x201D; in basketball</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2287131/posts</link>
<description>The Wall Street Journal is helping Leonard Mlodinow tout his book The Drunkard&#x26;#x2019;s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives. Among other things, Mlodinow, like academics Tversky, Kahneman, and Gilovich before him, wants to show that streaks in games like basketball don&#x26;#x2019;t exist. Or, rather, they do exist, but they can be &#x26;#x201C;explained by randomness.&#x26;#x201D; Listen: randomness can&#x26;#x2019;t explain anything. Statisticians imagine&#x26;#x2014;I choose this word carefully&#x26;#x2014;a basketball player has an ineffable probability of making a free throw, and they try to guess the probability&#x26;#x2019;s value through modeling. Suppose a guess is 80% for a particular player and then suppose our player...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2287131/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>