<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: hiddenfees</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/hiddenfees/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:01:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Bad Synergy: Consultants Score $1.5 Billion from Medicaid</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4391301/posts</link>
<description>Taxpayers are unknowingly paying private consultants a cut of the Medicaid money the consultants help states claim for school-based health services. Federal auditors have flagged more than $1.5 billion of those claims as improper or unsupported across four states, and the consultant was the same in every one: Boston-based Public Consulting Group (PCG). New Jersey&#x26;#x2019;s audit states the firm was hired &#x26;#x201C;on a contingency fee basis,&#x26;#x201D; and the Government Accountability Office has found consultants building school Medicaid claims collected fees of 3 to 25 percent of the federal reimbursement. The more school-staff time coded as &#x26;#x201C;Medicaid,&#x26;#x201D; the bigger the check....</description>
<author>Open The Books</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4391301/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New charge on dinner tab is in bad taste</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2463638/posts</link>
<description>Nothing succeeds in the travel industry like a bad idea. The latest hidden mandatory add-on is a &#x26;#x22;health&#x26;#x22; charge added to restaurant bills. As far as I know, this scam cropped up first in San Francisco, but you can count on it to spread. The rationale for this one is to cover the employers&#x26;#x27; mandatory contribution to the City&#x26;#x27;s &#x26;#x22;Healthy San Francisco&#x26;#x22; health-coverage system. The charge actually is levied on employers, but at least some restaurants are adding a few dollars or percentage points to each customer&#x26;#x27;s bill to cover this charge. The restaurants&#x26;#x27; excuse for assessing this charge separately...</description>
<author>The Chicago Tribune</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2463638/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>