<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: heien</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/heien/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:55:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Supreme Court decides police don&#x26;#x2019;t need to obey the law, don&#x26;#x2019;t need to know what it says</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3253598/posts</link>
<description>In December of last year, the Supreme Court continued a decades-long tradition of chipping away at 4th Amendment rights by ruling that police may violate those rights &#x26;#x201C;&#x26;#x2026;if the violation results from a &#x26;#x201C;reasonable&#x26;#x201D; mistake about the law&#x26;#x2026;&#x26;#x201D; In the case of Heien v The State of North Carolina, police sergeant Matt Darisse stopped a vehicle he considered &#x26;#x201C;suspicious&#x26;#x201D; because one of three tail lights was faulty. While writing a warning ticket, he then &#x26;#x201C;became suspicious&#x26;#x201D; of vehicle occupants and &#x26;#x201C;their answers to his questions.&#x26;#x201D; When vehicle owner Nick Heien gave Sergeant Darisse permission to search the car, the officer...</description>
<author>Coach is Right</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3253598/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>