<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: guncontrolactof1968</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/guncontrolactof1968/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:43:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Texas Federal Court Finds Partial Frames &#x26;#x26; Receivers are NOT Firearms</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4168674/posts</link>
<description>The ATF&#x26;#x2019;s attempt to expand the definition of a &#x26;#x201C;frame or receiver&#x26;#x201D; of a firearm has been deemed UNLAWFUL by a TX District Judge. The ATF CANNOT change the definition of a firearm without congressional approval &#x26;#x26; points out the language omitted by Congress regarding frames &#x26;#x26; receivers.The judge argues there is a CONTRADICTION OF LOGIC in ATF&#x26;#x2019;s argument that distinguishes between weapon parts kits &#x26;#x26; fully assembled weapons. During the Biden administration, the ATF has worked to vastly expand the definition of what a &#x26;#x201C;frame or receiver&#x26;#x201D; of a firearm is. On June 30, 2023, Texas District Judge Reed...</description>
<author>AmmoLand</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4168674/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>