<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: fiscalrule</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/fiscalrule/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:51:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The Debt Ceiling Fight in Historical Perspective: In the absence of a fiscal rule imposing a budget constraint, the most likely outcome of budget negotiations for 2024 is business as usual</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4126828/posts</link>
<description>House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and his Republican colleagues refuse to negotiate an increase in the debt ceiling without a reduction in federal spending. They propose capping discretionary spending in 2024 back to 2022 levels. This would require a reduction in discretionary spending of $133 billion. There is broad support within the Republican caucus that the spending cuts should be in non-defense programs. President Biden and his Democratic colleagues say that raising the debt ceiling automatically without negotiations over federal spending is &#x26;#x201C;not negotiable.&#x26;#x201D; For Democrats, the idea that discretionary spending should be reduced significantly and that the spending cuts...</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4126828/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2023 02:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>