<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: fiscaloutlook</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/fiscaloutlook/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:31:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>What&#x26;#x27;s Plausible for the Fiscal Outlook? (Looking at the possible outcomes)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2327993/posts</link>
<description>The first definition of &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201C;plausible&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201D; on dictionary.com is: plausible [plaw-zuh-buhl] having an appearance of truth or reason; seemingly worthy of approval or acceptance; credible; believable: a plausible excuse; a plausible plot. Note that it doesn&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;t say &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201C;likely&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201D; or &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201C;probable&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201D;&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2013;it connotes the notion of possibility not probability. I bring this up because many folks, especially the media, want to interpret the &#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201C;Concord Coalition Plausible Baseline&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x201D; as our best forecast of what the fiscal outlook will turn out to be. No, we&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;re not saying that&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;s the most likely outcome; we&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;re saying that&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;s a plausible, possible outcome. And it&#x26;#xC2;&#x26;#x2019;s a worst-case scenario, because...</description>
<author>Seeking Alpha</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2327993/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>