<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: enivrofascism</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/enivrofascism/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:05:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The Anatomy of Climate Science Hype</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2993558/posts</link>
<description>The manipulation behind Study of Ice Age Bolsters Carbon and Warming Link by Justin Gillis, New York Times, March 1, 2013 A NY Times science story (by Justin Gillis, March 1) illustrates some interesting points about science journalism - esp. in the contentious and politically charged issue of climate change. A scientific journal, in this case the renowned Science magazine, wants to gain publicity for its journal among the non-scientific readers of the NY Times. So it sends out a press release about a scientific paper it plans to publish. Of course, it has been &#x26;#x27;peer-reviewed&#x26;#x27; to the satisfaction of...</description>
<author>American Thinker</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2993558/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:05:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>EPA&#x26;#x27;s Greenhouse Gas Ruling Safe Despite Lawsuit, Legal Experts Say</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2736066/posts</link>
<description>Texas and 14 other states clearly want to deep-six the endangerment finding. &#x26;#x22;Overturning the endangerment finding would mean finding that EPA did not have a solid basis&#x26;#x22; for its decision, said Gerrard, director of the university&#x26;#x27;s Center for Climate Change Law, in an interview. &#x26;#x22;EPA has heaped up enormous volumes of evidence on one side. The evidence on the other side is exceedingly thin. &#x26;#x22;EPA is the agency that has the scientists with the expertise,&#x26;#x22; he continued. Before issuing the endangerment finding they &#x26;#x22;looked at it, relooked at it and re-relooked at it. They seriously examined critiques and still ended...</description>
<author>SolveClimate News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2736066/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>