<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: dsads</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/dsads/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:50:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Would New Jersey Bill Authorize Slow-Motion Euthanasia of Dementia Patients?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4380775/posts</link>
<description>Serious moves are afoot to allow ending the lives of dementia patients, either by allowing them to be killed by lethal jab euthanasia if requested in a written advance directive (where legal), or to allow a document to be signed requiring caregivers to withhold sufficient food and water to sustain life. New Jersey seems to move subtly in the latter direction with a vaguely worded bill, S.B. 4186, that could open the door to intentional legal undernourishment. From the bill: It is the public policy of this State to respect the dignity, autonomy, and previously expressed wishes of individuals living...</description>
<author>National Review</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4380775/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>