<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: crimsonbrownshirts</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/crimsonbrownshirts/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:34:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>A shameful episode in Harvard&#x26;#x27;s history
</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1279805/posts</link>
<description>Why would Harvard have embraced such a man? With everything that was known about the Nazis in 1934 -- their violent anti-Semitism, their book-burning, the concentration camps into which they were herding their enemies -- why would Harvard have treated a Nazi functionary like Hanfstaengl with such courtesy? Why would it let itself be used, in the words of historian Stephen Norwood, &#x26;#x22;to help cloak the Nazi cause with a layer of legitimacy?&#x26;#x22; In time, of course, Harvard became staunchly anti-Nazi. (Conant would go on to play a key national defense role during World War II.) But where was its...</description>
<author>Boston Globe (aka The National SOCIALIST Review)</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1279805/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>