<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: controloftheinternet</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/controloftheinternet/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:10:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>ISPs could be sued for letting customers read defamatory comments, says Leveson lawyer</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2980516/posts</link>
<description>Internet service providers could be sued for allowing their customers to read defamatory comments online, under a new law proposed by the lead counsel to the Leveson inquiry. Robert Jay, QC, who led the questioning of key witnesses including David Cameron and Rupert Murdoch, has suggested a solution for regulating the internet after Lord Justice Leveson largely ducked the issue in his 2,000-page report. Acknowledging that he was &#x26;#x201C;entering a hornets&#x26;#x2019; nest that Lord Justice Leveson wisely avoided&#x26;#x201D;, Mr Jay said that increasingly imaginative solutions were needed to make dissemination of defamatory content online subject to civil law.</description>
<author>Times of London</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2980516/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>