<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: collegeranking</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/collegeranking/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:10:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>University Rankings: Wall Street Journal, ACTA, QS</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2588104/posts</link>
<description>I, working with Cambria Consulting (see below), was involved heavily creating the WSJ&#x26;#x27;s rankings which are in today&#x26;#x27;s papers. All questions on the methods, I defer to them. College, or university, rankings are not and cannot be all-encompassing. This is because colleges are not singular entities, but serve at least three distinct purposes. The first, and probably foremost in most students&#x26;#x27; minds, is job training. This is rational: most employers now want a candidates to have a &#x26;#x22;degree&#x26;#x22; (a certificate only weakly correlated with education). To which school should a student go to get the best job? Second is in...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2588104/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>