<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: caliphoneyweddings</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/caliphoneyweddings/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:19:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>California Supreme Court asks what to do with S.F. same-sex marriages
</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118273/posts</link>
<description>The court would have to decide if the 4,000 marriages remain valid, if they would be automatically be voided or of they could they be voided at some time in the future. Assuming Newsom&#x26;#x27;s defeat, which many legal scholars predict, the court asked: &#x26;#x22;Would the marriages that have been performed and registered nonetheless be valid, would the marriages be voidable or would the marriages be void?&#x26;#x22; Lockyer has already told the court in briefs that the marriages, which have left the newlyweds in a state of legal limbo, are invalid and that those married should get their $82 fees refunded.</description>
<author>AP</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118273/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>