<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: californiacourts</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/californiacourts/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:08:16 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>California court expands liability for HIV infection</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1660042/posts</link>
<description>SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A person who has reason to believe he or she has HIV may be sued by sexual partners if they become infected, the California Supreme Court ruled on Monday, broadening the state&#x26;#x27;s view of when liability arises from the disease. Knowingly passing along HIV, which leads to AIDS, is already illegal in California and people who do so may be sued for damages in state court. The California Supreme Court&#x26;#x27;s decision widens the scope for law suits against sexual partners over negligent transmission. In their decision, a majority of the court&#x26;#x27;s justices held that they &#x26;#x22;cannot...</description>
<author>Reuters via Yahoo News</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1660042/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Jul 2006 04:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Firms must treat domestic partners like married pairs, top state court says</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1455541/posts</link>
<description>California businesses must treat same-sex domestic partners the same as married couples, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday in the case of a golf club that denied a family membership to a lesbian couple. The unanimous ruling was the court&#x26;#x27;s first on the state&#x26;#x27;s domestic partner law, which took effect this year and granted to registered partners most of the rights of spouses under state law.</description>
<author>The San Francisco Chronicle</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1455541/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Liberal Agenda and It&#x26;#x27;s Contradictions</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103159/posts</link>
<description>As I&#x26;#x2019;m sure you are aware, there are many disturbing things about liberals in this country. Liberals are extremely vocal in expressing their often- deviant views, and they are obnoxiously tenacious in their ceaseless efforts to have their agenda accepted by the majority of the American population. The word &#x26;#x201C;agenda&#x26;#x201D; is important in this situation. Liberals are rarely united by a systematic belief system; rather, they are motivated by certain goals set forth in an agenda and are ignorant of the contradictions that often arise from the conflicting goals they set out to win for themselves. Well, I should clarify....</description>
<author>The Troubadour</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103159/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 20:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>