Free Republic

No more Never-Trumpers, no more endless-war neocons, no more establishment shills. In addition, Nikki Hailey allegedly engaged in court documented adultery with a lobbyist:

Woo hoo! I hope that he also pardons Kyle Rittenhouse.

You can’t? What about the person who deliberately killed the baby?

They are both equally certain.

Rove insisted the Trump team has been "given every opportunity to prove them in a court of law and have failed to do so."

As far as I know, those alleging voter fraud in this past election have never been granted an evidentiary hearing in any trial. There has never been a ruling on the merits of the claims and therefore there has been no opportunity to prove them.

Rove, Bush, FoxNews, and the professional Republican political class are all over. They're done. They can now be seen for what they really are. We have rejected them and their endless self-enrichment. Their only future lies in the Democratic Party or whatever establishment institution ends up replacing it.

It’s doubtful that Dominion would ever sue since it would open them up to a pretrial discovery investigation. In addition, Mike Lindell has serious political potential and it would be foolish to give him a platform. He is a born again former narcotics addict who is a true believer and a true conservative. He is almost singlehandedly funding all of conservative media (including until recently FoxNews). I would not be surprised if he were to eventually inherit the Trump movement and be our presidential candidate sometime in the future. I would personally trust him over almost any current Republican office holder.

I can’t imagine a more certain path to eternal damnation than drinking (or injecting) baby soup.

I refuse to give my money to corrupt organizations.

The NRA is most effective civil rights organization in the world. Every organization touched by man is "corrupt". You just sound cheap and lazy.

Nothing is better than Bega Australian Canned Cheese. Nothing. It's so good it doesn't even have an expiration date!

The first step in any coup is to sever the lines of communication between the people and the legitimate leader. That is why the radio and TV stations immediately get occupied by the insurgent forces during third-world coups. That is exactly what has happened here. President Trump has now been cut off from Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Google, E-mail, and the National Emergency Broadcasting System.

It won't stop with conservatives being barred from communications. The actions of these tech oligarchs aren't ends in and of themselves, but rather the first step toward something far more sinister. They are openly proclaiming their intentions for conservatives to be economically cutoff, socially expelled, and perhaps eventually physically incarcerated.

However, I suspect that they must be scarred of something happening that could turn all of this around. Otherwise they would have taken their time, enjoyed their victory parties, and waited until January 20th to make their move. All of these preemptive strikes and plans for invoking the 25th amendment and impeachment don't make any sense unless there was something they feared would happen to prevent their victory.

Her alleged court documented adultery with a lobbyist:

I applaud Ambassador Haley for her honesty and candor. She has just saved us all four awkward years of her pretending to be a conservative worthy of Republican votes. Now we can instead focus on her shameful backstabbing, her endless-war neo-con foreign policy ideals, and her court documented alleged adultery.

Caleb Larson, a defense journalist based in Europe and holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics and culture.

This article is based on nothing more than what could be found on a two paragraph Wikipedia page. No USN personnel appear to have been interviewed, and the European author has likely never been in the same room with a firearm. Pure drivel.

I don’t know whether he is right or wrong about this, but I’ve been thinking for a while now that Mike Lindell has serious political potential. He is a born again former narcotics addict who is a true believer and a true conservative. He is almost single handedly funding all of conservative media (including until recently FoxNews). I would not be surprised if he were to eventually inherit the Trump movement and be our presidential candidate sometime in the near future.

George Clooney: Trump Name ‘Will Forever Be Associated With Insurrection’

That's very prescient of Mr. Clooney.

“When you see people doing spray disinfection of streets and sidewalks and walls and subways, I just don’t know of any data that supports the fact that we’re getting infected from viruses that are jumping up from the sidewalk,” he said.

...

Still, public health experts say that the best way to protect yourself against the coronavirus is to wash your hands with soap and water, avoid crowds, and wear a mask when leaving the house.

But the fact that there is absolutely no evidence that wearing a cloth mask protects you from the virus doesn't cause this "expert" any pause.

So far, Vice-president Pence has appeared to be completely loyal and ideologically aligned with President Trump and is the heir-apparent to the Trump movement. However, he will forfeit this entirely if he hesitates in the least in doing everything that he can possibly do to uphold our democracy and stop this theft of this election. At that point his career will be over since he will have completely alienated himself from both sides of the Republican Party. He seems smarter than that, but he might well be secretly compromised by the left like so many other Republicans. We will soon know.

Praying for Thomas’s full recovery.

This is very good news.

After a string of defeats in court, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling comes as much needed victory for President Trump and his allies.

Praise be to God!!! Please Lord have mercy on our nation and don't forsake us!

Your post is absurd. You appear to be making the argument that because some desecrate the flag, therefore it’s OK for anyone to do so.

I've done nothing of the sort. I simply pointed out that code you cited was rendered moot by a numerous court decisions.

Do you believe that it is acceptable to defecate on a flag?

I am personally opposed to the desecration of the US flag.

If not, where do you draw the line?

Burning and urinating on a flag certainly meets a common sense definition of desecration. Holding, hugging, and draping oneself in a flag certainly does not. However, both these definitions now differ from the federal code you cited based on established judicial precedent.

The Flag Code is clear;

The code you cited has been rendered moot and is now unenforceable. It is obsolete.

...whether you or some high school girl choose to abide by it is irrelevant.

The code you cited is now irrelevant. Also irrelevant, in my opinion, is the future value to our nation of anyone like you who would side with flag-hating leftists against a flag-loving teenage girl.

It may have been “effectively invalidated” (just as many parts of the Constitution have been), but it has not been repealed.

The sections you referenced have been struck down. There is no need to repeal it since repealing it would have no legal effect.

If you were capable of understanding simple English, you would grasp that I have not at any time attacked the girl’s patriotism, though I disagree with her way of showing it.

You falsely claimed that this patriotic young lady was breaking a law. No where on this thread have you indicated any support for her or her patriotism. From what you have written here, you are no different than the leftists who are trying to oppress her patriotism. If you do love the flag and this country, you should be ashamed of what you are doing here.

Nor have I stated that her actions are illegal, since she did not mutilate or deface the flag.

Certainly you did. You quoted a section of an outdated code that falsely portrayed her as breaking federal law.

Thus, as I said earlier, you (and she) may do as you please, and so will I.

You attempted to bring the law into a discussion in order to criticize a young girl's patriotism. This is clearly what you "please to do".

There are many ways to respect the flag that do involve adhering to the Flag Code, and those are the ways that I choose.

Then the code you cited is clearly as obsolete as you are. In world full of real flag desecration, you choose to criticize this this patriotic young woman for draping herself in the flag she loves. Although it is becoming apparent that you may not have the decency or self-awareness to know who you are siding with and who you are siding against, you really ought be ashamed of yourself and what you are doing here.