Free Republic

Re the upcoming hearing at SCOTUS regarding “birthright citizenship” as far as can be discerned, none of the parties in the present Supreme Court matters have identified the anomaly ... “Gray’s Anomaly” in arguments in 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision. I hope this major error by Gray in the 1898 decision regarding prior law, is pointed out by the Trump filings or by Amicus Curia filings. See: https://thepostemail.com/2025/04/23/wong-kim-ark-and-grays-anomaly/ #birthrightcitizenship #ussupremecourt #scotus #Trump #DonaldTrump #DonaldTrumpJr #DOJ

Re. A blast from the past! Obama was a pioneer in the credit card massive amounts of foreign money, money-laundering schemes. NY Post: Obama campaign accepted illegal foreign Web donations — and may be hiding many more: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/ny-post-obama-campaign-accepted-foreign-web-donation-and-may-be-hiding-more/ Feel free to forward this to investigators and sleuths working on the latest reported ActBlue money laundering scam.

All Roads Lead to Obama. He is the Evil “Manchurian Candidate” and Communist Mastermind of Everything Bad … | by Wayne Allyn Root | @ TheGateWayPundit.com via: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/02/26/all-roads-lead-to-obama-he-is-the-evil-manchurian-candidate-and-communist-mastermind-of-everything-bad-by-wayne-allyn-root-thegatewaypundit-com/ Elon Musk Donald J. Trump Joe Rogan Tucker Carlson Pam Bondi Kash Patel Dan Bongino JD Vance

Forget Where’s Waldo — Where’s Barack Obama? | by Susan Daniels – Licensed Private Investigator: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/02/21/forget-wheres-waldo-wheres-barack-obama-by-susan-daniels/ #DonaldTrump #JDVance #joerogan DineshD’souza #AlexJones #elonmusk #TuckerCarlson #GeneralMichaelFlynn #OwenShroyer #HarrisonSmith #InfoWars #USCongress #USSupremeCourt #USSenate #DOJ #repmtg #KashPatel

Trump needs to go after the head of the snake! Qbama’s Dreams Became America’s Nightmare – When Will the Judgement Come? https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/02/19/qbamas-dreams-became-americas-nightmare-when-will-the-judgement-come/ #DonaldTrump #JDVance #joerogan DineshD’souza #AlexJones #elonmusk #TuckerCarlson #GeneralMichaelFlynn #OwenShroyer #HarrisonSmith #InfoWars #USCongress #USSupremeCourt #USSenate #DOJ

I’m glad to see Donald Trump acting very aggressively to right the wrongs of the last 20 or so years under the era of Obama, Biden, and Harris. He is addressing the “Birthright Citizenship” issue. Correctly reading the drafters intent of the 14th Amendment and also the SCOTUS 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision and holding regarding the child of parents permanently domiciled in the USA, and not here on student VISAs, Kamala Harris was not even a Citizen of the United States when she was born in CA to parents who were both students temporarily in the USA on VISAs.

Trump also needs to take on the constitutional term “natural born Citizen”, as neither Obama was one as he was born with dual-Citizenship and foreign influence on him, contra to the original intent of the nbC term selected by the founders and framers. And of course Harris not even possessing the “noun” status of Citizen in that term, she was clearly not constitutionally eligible to be the VP.

Here is my latest on that. Exclusive Interview with CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret) on His New Book, Part IV - CONCLUSION: https://www.thepostemail.com/2025/01/30/exclusive-interview-with-cdr-charles-f-kerchner-jr-ret-on-his-new-book-part-iv/

The New Book Overview: A historical collection of the full-page newspaper Advertorial Insertions run in the Washington Times National Weekly Edition from 2009 to 2013 describing Barack Hussein Obama’s lack of Constitutional Eligibility to be the President and the Commander in Chief of Our Military.

Everyone in Power in Washington DC Knew, and Did Nothing!

They saw the Advertorials, got Sheriff Kit DVDs, saw the lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility, heard local and national Radio and TV Shows discussing Obama’s legal identity question issues as early as Dec 2007 via Chris Matthews’ TV show – and did nothing!

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee held a Presidential Eligibility Hearing for U.S. Senator John McCain but did not hold one for U.S. Senator Barack Hussein Obama! They allowed Obama to get away with ID fraud and usurpation of the Presidency! And our nation, our Constitution, and “We the People” suffered for it!

For the full News Release and why the book was published today, in addition to commemorating a now important symbolic annual date in the struggles of “We the People” to fully restore our constitutional government, and to learn who I believe was behind the set up this day in 2021, read it at: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/01/06/new-book-kerchner-v-obama-congress-by-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret/

I guess you missed this quote from John Bingham, framer of Amendment XIV. “ ... if of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty ... “. Complete quote and source below.

“All from other lands, who, by the terms of your laws and in compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentlemen can find no exception to this statement touching natural born citizen except what is said in the Constitution in relation to [Native American] Indians.” [underline emphasis added] Source: Congressman John Bingham (R) OH the “Father of the 14th Amendment”, 1862, Congressional Globe – http://www.usnaturalborncitizen.com/bingham.html“

See this link for more: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2024/06/14/quotable-quotes-re-citizenship-kinds-allegiance-and-the-presidential-eligibility-clause-in-the-united-states-constitution/

You’d fit right in at the Congressional Research Service (CRS) by omitting key information like they did for the facts in the Perkins v Elg (1939) U.S. Supreme Court findings and holding, like they did for the parents of the child in that case, i.e., not mentioning the both parents were naturalized citizens of the United States when their child was born in the USA and thus their child was a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, that is, a person born in the country of parents who were both citizens of the country. See section 212 of this (1758/1775/1797) legal treatise by Vattel on Principles of Natural Law: https://lonang.com/library/reference/vattel-law-of-nations/vatt-119/

Do you defend what the article by Joseph DeMaio that I posted above which started this thread, which points out, i.e., that the legislative attorney Jack Maskell of the CRS office deceived the members of Congress he was supposed to be serving?

Here is a link to another site regarding how important that nefarious CRS memo was in affecting the 2008 election. I wonder if Jack Maskell could be charged with election interference, or some other federal crime, either for what he did back then or for what he is doing now to cover up what he did back then.

The memo that changed America – The Radio Patriot
https://radiopatriot.net/2010/12/01/the-memo-that-changed-america/

I and my attorney Mario Apuzzo were on that radio show a couple times, along with many others back in 2009 and 2010 while my lawsuit was active and working its way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. See: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/radio-tv-news-interviews.htm

As all who followed the case, and many others after mine, they were turned away by all the courts using the “lack of standing” technicality tactic for the most part.

And the country paid the price for SCOTUS not taking the my case or another one on a “first impressions” basis to once and for all investigate the original intent, meaning, and understanding of the “natural born Citizen” term in the presidential eligibility clause in our U.S. Constitution, and render a decision as to how that term’s true meaning as the founders and framers intended it to mean for future Presidents and Commander in Chiefs, as directly applies to who can constitutionally serve in those offices. As early Supreme Court Chief Justices have said, that is their role in our system of government, to interpret terms in the U.S. Constitution, when such need arises. And it surely arose in 2008 with both Obama and McCain having questions about their “natural born Citizen” status. Congress held a hearing about McCain and adopted a resolution to give him a “pass” on the term, but refused to do the same for Obama. Hmmm, wonder why. The old double standard once again. Or maybe they knew the answer and thus did not wish to go there. Or was it fear of the racism charges from the media.

See this link for my lower court filings and then the certiorari filing to SCOTUS: https://www.scribd.com/document/61221761/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-DOC-00-Table-of-Contents-for-2nd-Amended-Complaint

Yes, I noticed that too. If it was Facebook or Twitter before it became X, I would suspect “shadow banning” of some type. I hope the deep state does not have any “friends” here. LOL

A recommendation to all readers of Joe DeMaio’s excellent expose article about the nefarious activities of the Congressional Research Service (CRS), past and present : Write a cover letter expressing your outrage at what the Congressional Research Service (CRS) has done, and continues to do via their continuing cover-up activities, and send it to all nine sittiing U.S. Supreme Court Justices and also to your U.S. Senators, House Representative, chair persons of key committees in the House and Senate, and to unfearful people like Congressman Gaetz and Congresswomen Marjorie Taylor Green and Nancy Mace. Also send it to leading pod-casters such as Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson.

The culprits at the CRS, were and are likely doing this at the behest of Nancy Pelosi. They need to have the public lime-light shined on them for that they have done and are doing in CYA mode now, need to be publicly exposed and punished. This needs to be exposed to the greater public and be made part of the history of events as to how our great constitutional republic was almost driven off a cliff by allowing the constitutionally ineligible persons of Obama and Harris to gain their respective high offices, and use their ill gotten power to try and wreck the country and convert it into a Socialist/Marxist hell-hole.

Synergy at Work! If we all do a little, together we can accomplish a lot!

CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired), Lehigh Valley PA USA, Author: Natural Born Citizen

The domestic terrorist couple of Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn likely taught Obama how to steal the identities and SSN’s from dead people. They were friends and neighbors in Chicago early on. Bill Ayers wrote about how they stole dead people’s identities in one of his books wherein he discussed his days in the Weather Underground and when he and others in that terrorist group where on the run from the law.

You would have to ask Susan Daniels that question. I think she allows comments and questions at her site. I only shared her latest article about Obama using a SSN stolen from a deceased person in CT who was born in 1890.

For further coverage of this new article by the Licensed Private Investigator Susan Daniels regarding her investigation regarding Obama using a SSN stolen from a deceased person in Connecticut and information about other forged identity documents Obama has used at various times in his life, click: here and/or here

“All from other lands, who, by the terms of your laws and in compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentlemen can find no exception to this statement touching natural born citizen except what is said in the Constitution in relation to [Native American] Indians.” [underline emphasis added] Source: Congressman John Bingham (R) OH the “Father of the 14th Amendment”, 1862, Congressional Globe – http://www.usnaturalborncitizen.com/bingham.html

Quotable Quotes: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2024/06/14/quotable-quotes-re-citizenship-kinds-allegiance-and-the-presidential-eligibility-clause-in-the-united-states-constitution/

Read the facts and holding of that 1898 SCOTUS decision re WKA. The also read what Mark Levin I quoted that he said on his Saturday show, and emphasized in my first comment above, " ... Of course not; we don’t confer citizenship on the children of tourists and diplomats and students. ... "

The Wong Kim Ark 1898 SCOTUS case did NOT apply to people who birthed children in the USA who were here in the USA as tourists, diplomats, students, or illegal alieninvaders!

Read the case holding and decision before you cite U.S. Supreme Court cases that do not apply. That is exactly what the far-left progressive movement and the enabling media have been doing for decades. And look what that finally got us -- Obama and Harris. CDR Kerchner (Ret) http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

And if you read the whole article, you will see that Mark Levin just said on his show: ” … Of course not; we don’t confer citizenship on the children of tourists and diplomats and students. … ”. Emphasis added.

Well Mark Levin, aka "The Great one" per another big voice, Sean Hannity, why didn’t you Mr. Levin state that complete set before. Because with the above truthful legally correct statement you just made, Kamala Harris was NOT a Citizen at/by Birth (CAB) of the United States when she was born to parents who were both students here in the USA temporarily on student VISA’s when Kamala was born in CA!

And thus, Kamala Harris not even being a "Citizen at Birth" (CAB), Kamala Harris certainly could not then have had two more adjectives applied to and in front of the Citizen noun, i.e., she thus could not be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, an (nbC), at birth either.

Levin and others with the big megaphones could have prevented the country from going through the nightmare governance under two de-facto Obama terms and a 3rd Obama behind the curtains term controlling the Biden administration, and Levin could have stopped the unconstitutional seating of Obama and of Harris. But he chose to remain silent when it really counted. And even worse to his not leading the charge to stop the constitutionally ineligible candidates of Obama and Harris, Mr. Levin instead chose to shout down call-ins to his radio show anyone who brought up the issue, and also to ignore learned people who challenged him to debate the issues of “birthright Citizenship” and “natural born Citizen” on his show, in response to his challenges to prove he was wrong back then.

NOW, with the pendulum swinging back to the truth and a We the People mandate given to Trump to clean up the mess that Levin allowed Obama and Harris to make of our country but not speaking up to oppose their constitutional eligibility for the offices they gained access to, now, he wants to come over to the right side of the debate on CAB and nbC terms, to the truth about the CAB and nbC terms. How convenient!

I remember at a Value Voters summit in Washington DC many years ago during Obama’s first term, where I and another person, personally approached Mark Levin face-to-face, since he was one of the guest speakers at the event, and handing to him information about the Minor v Happersett (1875) U.S. Supreme Court holding and decision which stated what a “natural born Citizen” ("nbC") is without any doubt, i.e., that an nbC is a person born in the country of parents who were both Citizens of the country, and that Obama was thus not one.

He said at the time that "he not familiar with that case”, which to us was unbelievable, and that he’d look at it later. We told him he should read it and speak out about it. He never did speak out about it and never did get back to us. Thus his comments to us at the time were pure B.S.

I believe he has known the truth about the CAB and nbC terms all along all along, but kept silent on purpose to keep his radio show and other media outlets available to him. So his personal financial status was more important to him back then, or fear of the racism charge, such that he chose to do nothing to stop Obama’s unconstitutional rise to the Oval Office, and Harris to the VP office, and put many and insulting roadblock and put down in the way of others who tried. By his silence, he helped the far-left get those two usurpers in office.

How does he continually get away with what he does! I don’t know.

See this “blast from the past” about how Mark Levin at times talks out of both sides of his mouth: https://www.thepostemail.com/2016/02/29/atty-mario-apuzzo-accepts-mark-levins-natural-born-citizen-challenge/

CDR Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA
Author: Natural born Citizen

See my analysis for her at: https://www.calameo.com/books/0057551429f0bcac7da60

The 14th Amendment doesn't say under the partial jurisdiction or limited jurisdiction or selective jurisdiction either, as some imply to the precise meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

The question before us here, stimulated by the article shared above, and the question Trump will be bring forth for clear cut resolution is, what does "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" truly meant in the 14th Amendment when the authors wrote it and passed it in Congress and then was ratified by the states.

I argue here that it means subject to the full political jurisdiction of the United States which would include being drafted into the U.S. military service if and when that need would arise. I would bet you that most foreign students here on temporary VISAs, tourists here, and illegal Alien invaders would skedaddle back to their home country pretty darn quick if the U.S. government tried to force them to serve in the military. And if they did not leave, their lawyers would argue that the U.S. Government does not have jurisdiction over them as they are Citizens of a foreign country. You appear to think otherwise. Trump is very right to bring this issue up for a full public debate and legal resolution by either the Congress and/or a new look at it by the U.S. Supreme Court, eventually.

Have fun with your word games. Trump will get this resolved. Get ready.

The media is putting up a straw-man argument. Trump does not want to amend the 14th Amendment. He just wants the 14th Amendment with its clause "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", and the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Wong Kim Ark (1898) with their binding interpretation until they would overturn it on a revisit of the subject, and have U.S. laws be correctly followed in regards to being a Citizen at/by Birth, and that the media should stop continuing to muddy the water as to the truth. So, Trump should call them on that straw-man they throw up. When they say that he wants to change the 14th Amendment or amend the Constitution, he should reply and say, what he wants to do is to correctly interpret the 14th Amendment and what the U.S. Supreme Court has decided on its interpretation, looking to the original intent by the authors and debaters when it was adopted and then ratified by the states for further guidance if needed to prove the correct interpretation, i.e., that it does not cover children of foreign students here temporarily on VISAs, tourists visiting the country, or illegal aliens who have invaded our country.