<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Articles Posted by Big Brother Go to Hell</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:bigbrothergotohell/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 00:21:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>What if Greenland becomes a state?</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4361469/posts</link>
<description>Should Trump really risk acquiring Greenland as a territory? I&#x26;#x27;m surprised the Democrats aren&#x26;#x27;t already smirking and hissing, &#x26;#x22;Go for it, Donnie!&#x26;#x22; They&#x26;#x27;d be thrilled to have a mix of disgruntled, race baiting Eskimos and entitled Eurotrash Danes demanding statehood. As with Washington D.C., Greenland would give the &#x26;#x27;Rat party an automatic two new AOC type senators and one Congress person if it were to join the Union. Maybe Greenland&#x26;#x27;s slender population of 56,000 would preclude statehood? Maybe enough fishermen, miners, oil field roughnecks, and other red blooded Americans would move into Greenland by the time the issue of statehood...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4361469/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 00:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Question about Michelle (Michael?) Obama </title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4359825/posts</link>
<description>First off, I don&#x26;#x27;t trust *anything* the Democrat media says. But why would they keep hiding and lying about Michelle Obama actually being a gay/&#x26;#x22;trans&#x26;#x22; male, if it were so? Wouldn&#x26;#x27;t they be out, loud, and proud with it by now? Wouldn&#x26;#x27;t they have gone on Oprah and boasted how &#x26;#x22;brave&#x26;#x22; our &#x26;#x22;first transgender first lady&#x26;#x22; is? Michelle actually being Michael just sounds like something the modern, reprobate minded Democrat party would be extremely open and boastful about.</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4359825/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jan 2026 00:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Combining Two Hoaxes</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4230434/posts</link>
<description>Why not combine the climate scam and &#x26;#x22;flat Earth?&#x26;#x22; Greta could star in a Biden campaign commercial. She could scold and screech on and on how only accepting communism and voting Democrat can prevent &#x26;#x22;climate change&#x26;#x22; from melting holes in the &#x26;#x22;ice wall&#x26;#x22; and letting Earth&#x26;#x27;s atmosphere leak out. Elon Musk could then propose giving Space X a contract to build a Mega Maid to suck up the escaping air and blow it back in!</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4230434/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Rigged Choice Voting, &#x26;#x22;Literacy&#x26;#x22; Tests, Etc.</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4174159/posts</link>
<description>Ever wonder why Democrats push rigged choice voting, err &#x26;#x22;ranked choice voting,&#x26;#x22; so hard? It *must* help them cheat somehow. I may have figured it out: they *love* to vote more than once. RCV automatically, legally, and officially lets them do that. It gets interesting when one considers how confusing RCV is. How many people only vote once, not knowing how RCV works? Fraud is easier to prove in regular, one person, one vote elections if the number of votes exceeds the number of voters. But it&#x26;#x27;s a lot harder to tell if the Democrats had their thumb on the...</description>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4174159/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>