<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: bleedinhheartattack</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/bleedinhheartattack/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:41:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>David Frum: Same Side? (Frum makes one good point and lays an egg.)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1431282/posts</link>
<description>An editorial in Saturday&#x26;#x27;s NYT denounces as &#x26;#x22;cynical&#x26;#x22; Karl Rove&#x26;#x27;s observation that (in the NYT&#x26;#x27;s paraphrase): &#x26;#x22;conservatives and liberals had different reactions to 9/11.&#x26;#x22; It continues: &#x26;#x22;Let&#x26;#x27;s be clear: Americans of every political stripe were united in their outrage and grief, united in their determination to punish those who plotted the mass murder and united behind the war in Afghanistan, which was an assault on terrorists.&#x26;#x22; Oh if only that were true. But the NYT itself is daily crammed with evidence that Rove is right and that the NYT editorialists are wrong. Take for example this story, which appeared on...</description>
<author>National Review</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1431282/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 02:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>