<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: andthemovies</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/andthemovies/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:12:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>&#x26;#x22;Ebert &#x26;#x26; Roeper&#x26;#x22; to air early-bird preview of &#x26;#x22;Passion&#x26;#x22;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1080879/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x22;Ebert &#x26;#x26; Roeper&#x26;#x22; to air early-bird preview of &#x26;#x22;Passion&#x26;#x22; posted by tvbarn on February 18, 2004 04:03 PM FILM CRITICS ROGER EBERT AND RICHARD ROEPER TO AIR EXCLUSIVE EARLY REVIEW OF THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST ON &#x26;#x201C;EBERT &#x26;#x26; ROEPER,&#x26;#x201D; FEBRUARY 21-22, 2004 After months of intense controversy that reached all the way to the Vatican, this weekend America&#x26;#x2019;s most prominent film critics, Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper, are set to air an exclusive early review of the completed version of Mel Gibson&#x26;#x27;s new film The Passion of the Christ. This special edition of &#x26;#x22;Ebert &#x26;#x26; Roeper&#x26;#x22; will air in...</description>
<author>TV Barn</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1080879/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 02:12:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guard, sex talk are sideshows -- issues should be center ring (BARF ALERT)</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1079145/posts</link>
<description>You&#x26;#x27;d think the political media as well as operatives for the Democratic and Republican parties would have learned two valuable lessons from Bill Clinton&#x26;#x27;s election victories: 1. Sexual high jinks, real or alleged, do not necessarily doom a candidate. In 1992 and in 1996, tens of millions of Americans probably agreed with the GOP assessment of Clinton as a horny, rutting pig -- and yet they voted for him anyway, because they didn&#x26;#x27;t think his sexual habits had that much relevance to his strengths as a world leader. 2. Military history (or the lack thereof) probably won&#x26;#x27;t be the determining...</description>
<author>Chicago Sun-Times</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1079145/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>