<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: ab2624</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/ab2624/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:52:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>The &#x26;#x201C;Stop Nick Shirley Act&#x26;#x201D;: How California Democrats Are Moving to Criminalize Citizen Journalism</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4374783/posts</link>
<description>They don&#x26;#x2019;t call it censorship anymore. They call it protection. Protection for communities. Protection for organizations. Protection from &#x26;#x201C;threats.&#x26;#x201D; The language is softer now, more strategic, designed to pass scrutiny without triggering it. But behind California&#x26;#x2019;s AB 2624, the intent is harder to ignore: if you document the wrong thing, in the wrong place, involving the wrong people, the state may decide you shouldn&#x26;#x2019;t be allowed to show it at all. And this time, they&#x26;#x2019;re not going after institutions. They&#x26;#x2019;re going after the individuals who don&#x26;#x2019;t need one. In Sacramento, that effort now has a bill number. AB 2624. According...</description>
<author>thecurrentreport.com</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4374783/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>