<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: 3dultrasounds</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/3dultrasounds/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:31:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Illinois Newspaper Refuses Pro-life Sonogram Ads as &#x26;#x201C;Too Graphic&#x26;#x201D;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576238/posts</link>
<description> CHICAGO, February 10, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) &#x26;#x2013; An Illinois newspaper has rejected ads from a pro-life group as &#x26;#x201C;too graphic&#x26;#x201D; because they include photographs taken with the new 3-D ultrasound technology. Joliet-based Herald News told CNS that they reserve the right to reject any advertising for any reason. Jill Stanek, a nurse and president of the Will County chapter of the National Right to Life Committee, contacted the Herald News asking to rent space for ads that included a picture of an unborn child in the womb. The caption for the ad said, &#x26;#x201C;I am an American. &#x26;#x2026; You know...</description>
<author>LifeSiteNews</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576238/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>