<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: 2020recount</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/tag/2020recount/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2020 23:38:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>There&#x26;#x2019;s something really STRANGE about Wisconsin&#x26;#x2019;s election results&#x26;#x2026;</title>
<link>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3901902/posts</link>
<description>There&#x26;#x2019;s something strange about Wisconsin&#x26;#x2019;s election results from last night and today that some people are picking up on. Kimberly Strassel will explain: 1) I am legitimately interested/confused by this. I checked, and the top number is indeed Wisconsin&#x26;#x27;s active registered voter number as of Nov. 1. The bottom is approx. what has been counted. That is a (not feasible) 89% turnout. 2) The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is claiming a 71% state turnout. I&#x26;#x27;m not sure where it gets this, but that would make more sense, given even populous Milwaukee didn&#x26;#x27;t exceed 83% turnout, and Dane lower. (Do math on...</description>
<author>Kimberly Strassel Twitter</author>
<comments>https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3901902/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2020 23:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>