Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will abortion-seekers need 'death warrants'?
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | December 9, 2002 | Felicia Dionisio

Posted on 12/10/2002 10:06:50 AM PST by heyheyhey

Georgia legislator seeks to give unborn babies right to jury trial


Posted: December 9, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Felicia Dionisio


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

Georgia legislators will introduce a bill early next month that refers to abortion as an ''execution'' and will require any mother seeking an abortion to go to court to obtain a death warrant.

''A mother would have to argue why the child should die and why her rights would take priority over the rights of the child,'' said Rep. Bobby Franklin, R-Marietta, who sponsored the legislation.

Once a mother filed for a death warrant, a guardian would be appointed to protect the rights of the unborn child. That guardian would be authorized to demand a jury trial in which the rights of the unborn child would be balanced against the rights of the mother seeking to have the ''execution'' performed.

''It's a grotesque violation of a woman's right to choose," said Ebony Barley of the Georgia Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League.

''Think about the women in rural Georgia. They'll be required to talk about their personal health experiences in court. ... It's the highest form of humiliation,'' she told WorldNetDaily.

The court would be able to hold a trial within 30 days of the filing of the petition and a death warrant would be signed only if the court finds that the rights of the person seeking to have the abortion are superior to the right of the unborn child to live. Either side could appeal.

Franklin told WorldNetDaily, ''It's an attempt to restore the 14th Amendment due-process rights of the unborn.''

''It's a constitutional protection that we all have that's not being adhered to when it comes to dealing with unborn children,'' Franklin said. ''The first thing we do as state representatives is take an oath of office to support the constitutions of the United States and the state of Georgia. Both ensure no person will be deprived of life or liberty without due process. We just want to make sure that's adhered to. Right now, the unborn child is losing his or her life without a trial.''

Those favoring unrestricted abortion on demand describe the bill as ''the most extreme'' attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade.

''Franklin's goal in introducing a bill that refers to abortion as an 'execution' is to open the floodgates to other 'anti-choice legislation,''' Barley added.

She said it's no coincidence the legislation is being introduced during the month that marks the 30th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalizes abortion. She points out the bill stipulates it will be automatically repealed on the day following the day the U.S. Supreme Court issues a decision expressly declaring the overturn of Roe v. Wade.

''It's not outlawing abortion; it's just recognizing the child has rights, too,'' said Franklin.

The bill also mandates that no physician can perform an ''execution'' in the state without first obtaining a death warrant.

If a doctor performs an abortion without a ''death warrant,'' he could be subject to up to five years imprisonment and permanent revocation of his medical license. But, there's no penalty for women who have an abortion without first obtaining a ''death warrant.''

Franklin, who has co-sponsored other anti-abortion legislation in the past, said medical practitioners have the most at stake because they're the ones who would be performing the ''execution.''

Franklin will officially introduce the bill at the beginning of the legislative session on Jan. 13. He said he hopes it will make it out of committee and then be called up for a vote by the whole House.

Ultimately, he hopes lawmakers in other states will be inspired by the concept of applying due-process rights to the unborn and propose similar legislation.

''I'm an optimist. I think if people who claim they support the concept of the Constitution, and also those who claim to support the sanctity of human life, if those people really do, we have a good shot at passing this thing.''




TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist

1 posted on 12/10/2002 10:06:50 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JMJ333; american colleen; narses; father_elijah; BlackVeil; nickcarraway; attagirl; Salvation; ...
I found this article through a link on this FR thread. Thank you Polycarp!
I decided it was newsworthy enough to deserve own new thread.
2 posted on 12/10/2002 10:07:53 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey; *Catholic_list; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
My pleasure, and a bump and ping back atcha!
3 posted on 12/10/2002 10:35:51 AM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
On first glance: wow!
I need to think more abotu this.
4 posted on 12/10/2002 10:40:04 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
''A mother would have to argue why the child should die and why her rights would take priority over the rights of the child,'' said Rep. Bobby Franklin, R-Marietta, who sponsored the legislation.

It's about time that such were required, and I laud the author of this bill for his moral and political courage. The fact is, the great majority of abortions are abortions of convenience. The greatest power we are given by God is to create a new human life, and a repository for a soul. To brutally and bloodily destroy our own children must be one of the greatest affronts to God that can be imagined. This bill would increase the burden of doing such squarely where it belongs - on the conscience of the mother who would rid the world of her (and the father's) child.

5 posted on 12/10/2002 11:06:33 AM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
It's a grotesque violation of a woman's right to choose

Abortion is a grotesque violation of a child's right to live.

6 posted on 12/10/2002 11:07:36 AM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
''It's not outlawing abortion; it's just recognizing the child has rights, too,'' said Franklin.

A radical, radical idea for so many who have moved far, far away from God.

7 posted on 12/10/2002 11:08:50 AM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
''I'm an optimist. I think if people who claim they support the concept of the Constitution, and also those who claim to support the sanctity of human life, if those people really do, we have a good shot at passing this thing.''

Let us pray...

8 posted on 12/10/2002 11:10:06 AM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
''Think about the women in rural Georgia. They'll be required to talk about their personal health experiences in court. ... It's the highest form of humiliation,''

Those women just have to deal with humiliation, but those babies have to deal with being killed by their own mothers. I don't know about you, but I'd be ALOT more humiliated knowing my mother didn't love me enough to even let me live.
9 posted on 12/10/2002 1:19:10 PM PST by GodsLittleOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
It's a grotesque violation of a woman's right to choose," said Ebony Barley

Can't be a real person ... This whole thing is a parody, right?

10 posted on 12/10/2002 5:04:29 PM PST by Tax-chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: heyheyhey
I like the sound of the title to this story and thread!
12 posted on 12/10/2002 6:00:05 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
This could slow the abortion process and lives might be saved.
13 posted on 12/10/2002 7:26:55 PM PST by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smevin
LOL!

This is good!
14 posted on 12/10/2002 7:59:51 PM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
hmmm. Use the courts the way they do. I like it. CD
15 posted on 12/10/2002 8:34:54 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyheyhey
"Once a mother filed for a death warrant, a guardian would be appointed to protect the rights of the unborn child. That guardian would be authorized to demand a jury trial in which the rights of the unborn child would be balanced against the rights of the mother seeking to have the ''execution'' performed."


Wonderful! Nothing can stop abortion faster than trying to argue its virtues. Remove the abstract discussions and let the jury hear the beating heart and let the mother explain that this is only a mass of cells and not a living human being. Let any mother try to explain to a jury of her peers why she should be allowed to kill her child and see whether her "choice" even makes sense to her own ears.

Abortionists fear this for good reason.
16 posted on 12/11/2002 9:28:12 AM PST by pgyanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Don't forget the big economic boost to lawyers . :)
17 posted on 12/15/2002 6:39:57 PM PST by dadwags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson