Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: nate4one
A very excellent understanding of my point of view which is why Woody's Saddam example is moot.

Nope! You must acknowledge that during 32AD and 70AD that there were things offensive in the Lord's kingdom.
998 posted on 09/19/2002 9:15:23 AM PDT by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 991 | View Replies ]


To: CCWoody; All
The next poster is a millennialist (literally)
999 posted on 09/19/2002 9:18:35 AM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 998 | View Replies ]

To: CCWoody
You must acknowledge that during 32AD and 70AD that there were things offensive in the Lord's kingdom.

Yes. They were called Apostates and Old Covenant teachers. They still had a covenant with God the Old one, and they kept those who would be saved under bondage.

That was removed in AD 70 when they were utterly destroyed and taken captive by the Romans. And THEN the New Covenant was instated, and now NOTHING OFFENSIVE CAN enter the kingdom, becaquse the kingdom is a spiritual reality, not a physical Old Covenant!!
1,007 posted on 09/19/2002 9:31:00 AM PDT by nate4one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 998 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson