[jlogajan]

Darwin started his search with the question of how things could exist without God: Not as an indifferent scientist).

You know this is ad hominem (to the man) and therefore irrelevent. Evolution stands or falls on its own merits, not the motivation of its proponents. The same is true for proponents of "Intelligent Design." Of course their agenda is to prove God. So? ID stands or falls on the evidence they bring to the table. In that department they have a lot of work to do.

[gore3000]

Darwin started his search with the question of how things could exist without God: Not as an indifferent scientist). -lady doc-

You know this is ad hominem (to the man) and therefore irrelevent.

No it is not irrelevant. It is imbued in the whole philosophy of evolution. Darwin was an atheist but deceitfully hid it from the world throughout his life. In other words, he was a liar. That may be an attack on his character, but it is not an ad hominem. It is a factually correct statement.