I think that was what I was saying. Science is a technique to discern the physical world.
However, outside the physical world, too often the "scientific method" is used to distort reality to the ideology of the so called "scientist". Eugenics would be an example, as would much of what passes for "social science". Darwin, by deciding to frame his theory as an argument against the need for God, was being unscientific. Evolution itself goes against the law of entropy, implying there is something in evolution that pushes toward complexity. In the PC days of Darwin, they called this the "life force". I remember being taught cells had this magic "protoplasm" that allowed cells to divide. Now things are more complicated. Similarly, these bozos are arguing an evolutionary theory that has magical qualities versus an evolutinary theory that has theological qualities. This makes it a religious arguement.
And since it ignores the basic philosophical premises, it is a bad argument from a philosophical standpoint. Essentially it is an argument by one set of semi ignorant religious fundamentalist against a set of semi ignorant irreligious fundamentalists.