Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [THE FINAL DEBUNKING]
Scientific American ^ | 17 June 2002 | John Rennie

Posted on 06/17/2002 3:10:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 2,461-2,474 next last
To: LadyDoc
A lot of the arguments here are based on an unsupported first theory, i.e. that only science is true, and that science is TRUTH. Therefore, all other belief systems are FALSE and therefore all other belief systems should be rooted out and destroyed.

Great post.

821 posted on 06/17/2002 8:47:53 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Darwin is on the rocks, you just can't get over it.

Creationism died 150 years ago. Get over it!

822 posted on 06/17/2002 8:49:12 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Why? Because HE couldn't make them right to begin with!

You're assuming God is no wiser or capable than you are. You're also assuming you can deduce in your mind the purposes God had for doing the things He did and allowing the things He allowed. Your standard is your own competence and intelligence. You cannot rise above it.

If God were a mere man--if he were no smarter than you--you would have a compelling point to make about his incompetence. But if He were no smarter than you, He would have never gotten this amazing universe and its astounding richness of life underway.

Go ahead, Vade Retro. You're a bright fellow. Create a universe and have it give rise to life.

823 posted on 06/17/2002 8:51:39 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
You're a silly man, Vade Retro. All air, no proof.
824 posted on 06/17/2002 8:52:52 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Creationism died 150 years ago. Get over it!

Another great comeback! You seem to be fighting ghosts and losing.

825 posted on 06/17/2002 8:53:04 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
"I believe people who claim to have experienced "green" are delusional. And, as general re sagely points out, the fact the 5 billion people claim to have experienced the color green isn't persuasive. . . . . something about 5 billion flies having a taste for manure."

I think that in one sense, "greenness" is an objective quality of objects, insofar as it represents light in a particular wavelength of the visible spectrum. But in another sense, saying something is "green" is entirely arbitrary, as there is no inherent connection between the label and the thing itself - we could have as easily decided that the sky was green and the grass blue, and so long as we behave consistently with those decisions, what's the difference?

You say you are incapable of experiencing "greenness", but you want to know what it is like - all I can do is try to reason with you analogically. It's the color of live grass in the summer. The color of unripe apples. It's light with a wavelength of around 510 nm.

And when you say to me "All that's fine, but I still don't understand green", then my ability to help you understand fails. Because at that point, I can't make you see something as subjective as "green" - I don't have an objective reference point for "green" beyond a collective decision that humans have made that the grass is "green", and when you have no perception of things that are objectively green, how can I make you understand something as subjective as "greenness" itself"?

Does the greenness of a thing change if you're the only one to see it? Does the "greenness" of a thing mean anything if you're the only one around to see it? Would it make a difference if you decided that the sky was green and the trees were blue? Who would it make a difference to? You? The trees?

826 posted on 06/17/2002 8:54:59 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
You're assuming God is no wiser or capable than you are.

When somebody catches God doing something, He has a place in science class.

I'll address any further rantings in the morning.

827 posted on 06/17/2002 8:55:45 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Are these basically the same people who gave us the nuclear bomb, biological, and chemical weapons?
828 posted on 06/17/2002 8:56:44 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saturnalia
Placemarker::

It is currently 11:52 pm EST

IT IS NAPPY TIME FOR THE CREVO THREAD
829 posted on 06/17/2002 8:57:22 PM PDT by Saturnalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Perhaps someone will frighten me into it someday with their stories about "lakes of fire" and the like. I suspect that almost all faith is ultimately born of fear.

That's an interesting point. I don't know that I disagree with that entirely -- as the song says "Twas Grace that taught my heart to fear/ Grace my fear relieved/How precious did that Grace appear, the hour that I believed.

On the other hand, before Christ it appears fear of death was a far greater plague on humanity. Human sacrifice was fairly common to appease angry gods. There have been many reports of people sacrificing their own children.

My view is to believe things because they are true, not to seek a happy afterlife.

830 posted on 06/17/2002 9:10:44 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
I'll heartily concede that Christianity is "better for you" than Islam, and many people do make a more-or-less informed decision about which belief system to accept or reject. And both these religions have converted specific peoples, at one time or another in their histories, more thru evangelism than thru force alone. But the sad fact is that historically both of these huge religions acheived their impressive growth thru State-sanctioned oppression.

Nobody forces anybody to be a Christian today. Why do so many hundreds of millions around the globe make that choice?

831 posted on 06/17/2002 9:11:17 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 761 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Following or not following the tenets of their faith isn't the issue. You think people no longer worship Athena, etc., because they made some kind of rational decision.

Why no Athena movement in the world today? If the ideas behind it were so powerful, people would be fighting for the freedom to worship as such. The better ideas come forward over time (idea evolution?). Take communistic atheism vs. Roman Catholicism. One's dying out, the other is the largest religion in the world, and is growing as a percentage of total global population.

832 posted on 06/17/2002 9:14:37 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Sorry to disagree with you, but an infinite amount of monkeys will produce all of the works ever written by man or will be written by man(assuming a finite man) in the time it takes to type the longest tome.

Yes, you're right. But it's a moot point, since can never have an infinite number of monkeys.

833 posted on 06/17/2002 9:16:16 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: general_re
More seriously, the fact that lots of people are doing it is not necessarily an indication of the rightness or wrongness of that thing. One of my philosophy professors once memorably labeled this sort of argument as the "eat sh*t" argument, since the form was identical to saying "Why not eat sh*t - after all, a hundred billion flies can't be wrong" ;)

Well, of course you're right in one sense. The fact that a lot of people do something is not necessarily an indication of its rightness. But it is true that better ideas tend to win out over time in the hearts and souls of people. That's why Christianity is the world's most followed religion, while nobody eats sh*t. At the very least, a curious and open mind would want to know why so many people follow it, and what they get from it.

834 posted on 06/17/2002 9:19:09 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I don't have an objective reference point for "green" beyond a collective decision that humans have made that the grass is "green", and when you have no perception of things that are objectively green, how can I make you understand something as subjective as "greenness" itself"?

A wholly indescribable subjective awareness that is neverthless very objective and perfectly consistent in the way we experience it.

True Christians likewise collectively share an experiential awareness of the Holy Spirit every bit as vivid and real as the "greenness" of green. You can deny that you yourself can discern or experience it, but you cannot deny this collective experiential awareness on the part of Christians themselves.

And it is not as simple as describing color as a wavelength. All the detailed, measurable, weighable, chartable information about the electromagnetic wavelength that lies between the wavelengths of yellow and blue will not impart the experiential sense of "greenness" to someone who is color-blind to green.

835 posted on 06/17/2002 9:19:13 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Wow! What's up on FR today? 835 posts before I can catch up with the thread.
836 posted on 06/17/2002 9:26:13 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: medved
I have, at one period, absolutely begged any supernatural being out there to come and enter my life to help me with my problems. Nobody bit. Not God, not Satan, not Baal, not Athena, not some supernatural being who I haven't even heard of ... nobody!

Well, some would say that solving your problems is not the main intent of God. Rather, it would be (for many) to help form you into a better person (one who does more acts of selfless good, and fewer acts of harm to oneself and others). Of course, when one does so, many problems tend to evaporate over time.

837 posted on 06/17/2002 9:27:46 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
The Big Bang, the cosmos, abiogenesis, morality, art, love, intelligence, and free will…

It IS hard to explain morality (particularly self-giving morality, such as Christianity), consciousness, music, love, in all its forms, man's ability to solve mathematical theorems, and so forth, purely from evolutionary theory.

838 posted on 06/17/2002 9:30:23 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
You need a new user name. The real Patrick Henry was a CREATIONIST!

Patrick Henry (1736-1799), was an American Revolutionary leader and orator, who spoke the now famous phrase, "Give me Liberty or give me death!" He was Commander-in-Chief of the Virginia Militia, a member of the Continental Congress, a member of the Virginia General Assembly and House of Burgesses as well as having helped to write the Constitution of the State of Virginia. He was the five-time Governor of the State of Virginia, (being the only governor in United States history to be elected and re-elected five times).

Patrick Henry was offered numerous positions by President George Washington and Congress, but declined them all, including: Secretary of State, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, U. S. Minister to Spain, U. S. Minister to France and U. S. Senator.

Prior to the Revolution, in 1768, Patrick Henry rode for miles on horseback to a trial in Spottsylvania County. He entered the rear of a courtroom where three Baptist ministers were being tried for having preached without the sanction of the Episcopalian Church. In the midst of the proceedings, he interrupted: "May it please your lordships, what did I hear? Did I hear an expression that these men, whom you worships are about to try for misdemeanor, are charged with preaching the gospel of the Son of God?"

On March 23, 1775, the Second Virginia Convention had been moved from the House of Burgesses to St. John's Church in Richmond, because of the mounting tension between the Colonies and the British Crown. It was here that Patrick Henry delivered his fiery patriotic oration: "For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery... It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country... Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt.... An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!.... Sir, we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. Three millions of people, armed in the Holy cause of Liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.

Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations; and who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

On June 12, 1776, as a member of the committee chosen to draft the first constitution of the commonwealth of Virginia, Patrick Henry helped champion article 16 of the Virginia Bill of Rights: That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.

Patrick Henry wrote on the back of The Stamp Act Resolves passed in the House of Burgesses, May, 1765, a summary of the pivotal events preceding the Revolution. He ends with this admonition: "This brought on the war which finally separated the two countries and gave independence to ours. Whether this will prove a blessing or a curse, will depend upon the use our people make of the blessings, which a gracious God hath bestowed on us. If they are wise, they will be great and happy. If they are of a contrary character, they will be miserable. Righteousness alone can exalt them as a nation. Reader! Whoever thou art, remember this, and in thy sphere practice virtue thyself, and encourage it in others."

Patrick Henry boldly declared: "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here."

Patrick Henry, once interrupted while engaged in Bible reading, held up his Bible and said: "The Bible is worth all other books which have ever been printed."

Patrick Henry wrote to his sister Ann in Kentucky, upon learning of the death of her husband, Colonel William Christian: "Would to God I could say something to give relief to the dearest of women and sisters.... My heart is full. Perhaps I may never see you in this world. O may we meet in heaven, to which the merits of Jesus will carry those who love and serve Him. Heaven will, I trust, give you its choicest comfort and preserve your family. Such is the prayer of him who thinks it his honor and pride to be, Your Affectionate Brother, Patrick Henry."

On November 20, 1798, in his Last Will and Testament, Patrick Henry wrote: "This is all the inheritance I give to my dear family. The religion of Christ will give them one which will make them rich indeed."

While Patrick Henry was dying, he spoke: "Doctor, I wish you to observe how real and beneficial the religion of Christ is to a man about to die.... I am, however, much consoled by reflecting that the religion of Christ has, from its first appearance in the world, been attacked in vain by all the wits, philosophers, and wise ones, aided by every power of man, and its triumphs have been complete."

Patrick Henry's grandson, William Wirt Henry, described Henry as one who: "Looked to the restraining and elevating principles of Christianity as the hope of his country's institutions."

Patrick Henry Fontaine, who was also a grandson, said Patrick Henry had committed himself to the: "Earnest efforts to establish true Christianity in our country."

839 posted on 06/17/2002 9:31:45 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
I simply pointed out that the early growth of Christianity - just as impressive as the early growth of Islam 4 centuries later - was due to the coercive power of the State forcing it on the populace,

Well, it's pretty amazing that a few powerless men could spread Christian ideas into the Roman world, and have the Roman emperor decree some years down the road that Christianity be the Roman religion (thus abnegating all Roman tradition and belief). JennyP, you are deluged in history. But today, few are coerced in their beliefs. Yet Christianity continues to grow (look at Africa, for instance). There must be something there that 1) is of great value to people; 2) stands the test of time; 3) is better than alternative ideas against which it is tested.

840 posted on 06/17/2002 9:34:57 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 2,461-2,474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson