You need to re-read what I wrote. "...role of some Jews in Deicide." I am also responsible due to my sins. But, you'll have to try your guilt trip on another as I haven't harmed a Jew in my life and I advocate that the necessity for them to accept Jesus as the Messiah be preached to them, so I don't feel guilty about sins committed by others.
tionally, for it to be "deicide", God would have to die. Jews of course do not accept that Jesus was God in the first place, so from our perspective his death could not be deicide. And the very idea of God dying is fraught with existential difficulties.
There are those who think that death means "cease to exist" rather than "seperation of Body and Soul." I don't know what your thoughts are.
Has ANY RABBI, in the HISTORY of the WORLD APOLOGISED for the HATE LITERATURE ABOUT OUR SAVIOUR AND HIS MOTHER THAT CONSTITUTED PARTS OF THE TALMUD?
l, at least you don't call it "blasphemy".
I am happy to do so. IT IS BLASPHEMY.
Does this surprise you?
No. They lied about Him while He was alive, so lies about Him after death are unsurprising.
Certainly it is no worse in content, and far less in sheer volume, than the anti-Jewish writings of the church, from the gospel of John...
The Gospel of John is TRUTH. That you experience the witness of truth as an attack is judgement about you, isn't it?
It is hysterical fulminations such as yours which lead to popes having to apologize for the behavior of Catholics.
LOL You haven't heard anything, yet. I am part Irish, part Algonquin. BTW, I will alert you a second time to the FACT that I am not moved by such twaddle. Grow-up. You just offered a half-assed defense of BLASPHEMY against Jesus our Saviour in the Talmud but you correct me for being insufficiently Catholic in behavior.
Your arrogance is astounding.
You'll need to reread what I wrote. I did not specifically accuse you personally of anything. Do you deny that Catholics have targeted Jews in the past for retribution for "deicide"?
I am happy to do so. IT IS BLASPHEMY.
Yawn. "Blasphemy", by definition, is something said against God. Since Jesus isn't God, it can hardly be blasphemy.
No. They lied about Him while He was alive
Sez you. Your remarks are grounded in the assumption that Jesus was who he was claimed to be. I don't buy that.
The Gospel of John is TRUTH.
the gospel of John is not inspired. It is a mix of some actual history and much pious hagiography.
That you experience the witness of truth as an attack is judgement about you, isn't it?
If it were truth, it might be.
BTW, I will alert you a second time to the FACT that I am not moved by such twaddle.
You sure do like CAPITAL LETTERS, don't you? Let me REMIND you that it was YOUR HYSTERICAL RANT that PROVOKED ME to reply to you IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Grow-up.
Physician, heal thyself.
You just offered a half-assed defense
Please: NO profanity...
of BLASPHEMY against Jesus our Saviour
Its not blasphemy. Jesus isn't God. He isn't "our Saviour". He was a man. That is the "TRUTH". If you are going to try to push your beliefs on me, don't expect to hold back from saying what I believe. If you find it blasphemous, tough.
Your arrogance is astounding
LOL! The irony of such a statement coming from you is truly amusing.