Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
All right, let me clarify this...First off, the word "Palestine" is mentioned in the King James version of the Bible and we (including today's marchers) all know what it means now even if it didn't mean the same thing at the time of the translation. Now, the point is that most people acknowledge that there will ultimately be a "Palestinian" state if there is to be peace in the region. Given this, my point was that it seemed to me that the folks parading here were either in denial or to the right of Sharon and are not really interested in "peace". As I said in the "comment" above, it seems to me that the morally correct chant would have been something else...
11 posted on 05/05/2002 10:24:35 PM PDT by rpage3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: rpage3
...First off, the word "Palestine" is mentioned in the King James version of the Bible and we ..all know what it means now even if it didn't mean the same thing at the time of the translation.

We all know that is what YOU meant so arguing on your understanding of words is useless. What you are saying is that the Palestinians existed then and deserve the Jews giving up their land now to make them exist. You use the Bible as the foundation of your argument by changing the meanings of the words to what you want. Don't work that way. God knows what the meaning of "is" is.

Then you deny God by asking if I believe in a God that... denying the very Bible you pretended to believe in the first place, followed by using the New Testament to drive a wedge against the Jews. You are about to learn a scripture The Word of God is a two-edged sword, it cuts both ways. Now that you have used the Bible as a weapon, you will be judged by it.

You just opened a God sized can of Whoop-ass, and there is no-one who can cork it but God Himself.

29 posted on 05/05/2002 10:58:38 PM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rpage3
Now, the point is that most people acknowledge that there will ultimately be a "Palestinian" state if there is to be peace in the region.

I believe that Dick Armey, who supports transfer of the Palestinian populaztion, is not one of the 'most people' you are referring to. In any case, we are talking about what is true, and what is right, two matters connected only by coincidence to popular opinion.

47 posted on 05/06/2002 2:27:56 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rpage3; Yehuda; NewWahoo
No, it is NOT mentioned in the King James.

Who told you that, and what verse did they tell you it was mentioned in??

59 posted on 05/06/2002 3:06:30 AM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rpage3
Now, the point is that most people acknowledge that there will ultimately be a "Palestinian" state if there is to be peace in the region. .... As I said in the "comment" above, it seems to me that the morally correct chant would have been something else...

I disagree. Most people recognize that there will never be peace in the middle east until Jesus returns. There is no Palestine and the arabs (moslems) will always hate the Jews.

The religion of Islam is trying to stamp out Judaism and Christianity because the founder of islam (satan) hates the people of God.

The morally correct chant is exactly what they were chanting, the truth!

God Save America (Please)

86 posted on 05/06/2002 5:45:23 AM PDT by John O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson