To: SeekAndFind
Just because the linen is that old, doesn’t mean the image is that old.
The image could have been added centuries after the linen was first woven.
3 posted on
08/21/2024 8:11:28 AM PDT by
Brookhaven
(Ted Cruz said Jan. 6 was terrorism; don't forget that the next time you vote.)
To: Brookhaven
The image could have been added centuries after the linen was first woven.If it could have been added, then it clearly could be reproduced. But it can't be reproduced.
9 posted on
08/21/2024 8:43:43 AM PDT by
FatherofFive
(we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor)
To: Brookhaven
“The image could have been added centuries after the linen was first woven.”
True, but efforts to produce a copy have failed miserably.
11 posted on
08/21/2024 8:50:00 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
To: Brookhaven
”The image could have been added centuries after the linen was first woven.” So some guy in the 1300s went to the time, trouble and expense, to purchase a thousand year old piece of linen? Assuming he could even find something like that, why would he do it? To fool people 700 years in the future, using tests he could never even conceive of?
19 posted on
08/21/2024 9:31:32 AM PDT by
Flag_This
(They're lying.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson