Replies

The Trinity is found in the Word of God, and the scene of John Baptising Jesus is an example of same.

You revealed you knew this thread would be an agitation,
so stop tryign to hide your motives: "... when I have tried to caucus something to avoid expected unpleasantness."

Albeit, a brother in Christ here, there is so much here you have written that is not agreeable.
Firstly- Are you suggesting that there has been anything I have posted of my Catholic Faith, that HAS NOT BEEN agitating to you? Is that even possible ?
ME THINKS thou protest a little too much as you should know.by.now. my unwavering Catholic position. It's as if you pretend not to know where I am coming from...
Or are you saying not everything I post is agitating- though only sometimes may be?

I think we can agree upon it being the latter then...
I post a Mass Gospel Reflection everyday while steeped in richness and beauty of the Catholic faith can give anyChristian reason to pause and ponder- WITHOUT agitation.
I do that everyday, you know it, and its never caucused- even though it CAN BE.
I believe in sharing. More so in proclaiming... The belabored point being is I'm not trying to "pull one over on you"- Shame on me- NO.. Woe unto me... if I am NOT unquestionably more direct in any opposition when engaging the misconceptions of the Catholic Faith of 2000 years.

Now if my mere presence is cause for agitation, I cannot help you with that. I can point out that you needn't twist or mischaracterize what I am saying though to get beyond those feelings.

I CLEARLY wrote :

On the flip side, I am also over having the RM sending me a no-no reply when I have tried to caucus something to avoid expected unpleasantness.

Again, I cannot help either that the anti-Catholic "false church", "whore of Babylon", Jack Chickers on FR will be displeased with ANY discussions - and need NO encouragement to disparage the Faith regarding the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist- Papacy, etc. etc.- but these are very important doctrines that have been misunderstood, misrepresented far too long and correction needs to reach those who err in what they need to understand of it- Inside OR outside the Church.

So...my "motives"? are not covert or hidden at all... and I have expressed them before here as well..

So you know, our role is to "proclaims Jesus Christ as the source of conversion and new life- and re-affirmation of the old, lapsed life.. so yes- Guilty as charged... my hope is to "draw people into the body of Christ, which is the Church, and thereby give them access to all the gifts that Jesus wants his people to enjoy- and lead abundant lives."

Now tell me how in the H. E. double hockey sticks the Trinitarian formula- NOT identified in Scripture- is NOT a man (Council) developed doctrine- that is acceptable ? and that the Immaculate Conception is an unaccepted man developed doctrine though also not identified either in the Bible ?...(leaving aside for the moment that The Bible is never mentioned in the Bible.)
Help me out here...please.