[ealgeone]

The table of contents in our modern Bibles are added by publishers and are not part of the inspired text. There is no "inspired table of contents." This is an insolvable dilemma for Protestants, especially if one holds to the man-made doctrine of Sola Scriptura.

Roman Catholics really do themselves a disservice by appealing to Tim Staples and Catholic Answers for their apologetics.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

The table of contents in our modern Bibles are added by publishers and are not part of the inspired text. There is no "inspired table of contents." This is an insolvable dilemma for Protestants, especially if one holds to the man-made doctrine of Sola Scriptura.

...................................

One of the stupidest arguments I've seen bandied about on this forum.

Any 6th grader could look at the Bible and make a table of contents.

Really tells you Catholicism has nothing, but a desire to cling to the appearance of the Roman Wizard.

[daniel1212]

Roman Catholics really do themselves a disservice by appealing to Tim Staples and Catholic Answers for their apologetics.

This has often been shown to be the case. See here for two cases re. the former.

[fidelis]

It is a logical fallacy (ie, a “genetic fallacy”) to object to an argument based on its source. The question is whether the argument is valid or not, which in this case, it is. Try answering the argument rather attacking the messenger.