To: ealgeone
Isn’t it sad that Paul didn’t have the Osteen prosperity gospel. Poor Paul had to continue to work as a tanner as he trudged his way around the Med, evangelizing. And he lacked Kenneth Copeland’s ecumenism spirit, so he didn’t know to weld his gospel message to the local religious beliefs. [/sarcasm]
22 posted on
04/17/2018 1:13:17 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: MHGinTN
Isnt it sad that Paul didnt have the Osteen prosperity gospel. Or that he didn't have a caucus thread to hide behind to avoid the debate.
41 posted on
04/17/2018 5:16:54 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: MHGinTN
A profit without honour? 😉
134 posted on
04/19/2018 3:32:31 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson