Right you are, AF. My post should have referenced your post #456 wherein you altered the wording of post #451 without notation. My bad for assuming you would see the log ...
Ah, the slippery slope of false analogy, or is it comparative religion ?
If you pay close attention, and I will aid you by repeating my post #507 with boldness so that you may understand more clearly, #507 inquired in reference to using one's own words with quotation marks and falsely attributing them to another. #456 used my own words in a normal bold font to make them stand out as different. It used italic font for the phrase from which I borrowed, and to which I responded, and did not write that my creative thought was really another's. It was my thought on the matter so I did not falsely attribute it to another.
#456
You don't get the staggering point of that verse.....Jesus would deny anyone who does not continue to do the will of the Father!
#507
Is mocking Catholics by attributing your own words to them in false quotes walking in the Spirit or walking after the flesh ?
In summary, I can recognize an error in someone's post and creatively correct it, presenting it as my words, my thought, without quotation and false attribution, completely owning my post as my own.
To quote someone with words they did not use is false testimony. Do you consider that walking in the Spirit or walking after the flesh ?