[CynicalBear]

>>Here is the first example, on this thread in but the fourth post<<

BTW I think that was posted as a joke about how important Luther's actions are to Catholics rather than Protestants.

[af_vet_1981]

You wrote "I haven't seen that. I have seen them refute Catholic statements about him. It's the Catholics who bring Luther into the conversation." When I show you evidence that each of these three points was false you gainsay it with "BTW I think that was posted as a joke about how important Luther's actions are to Catholics rather than Protestants."

1. You have seen now seen "that."
2. No Catholic had yet posted a statement on this thread about him at that point so there was nothing for a poster to refute.
3. No Catholic had brought him into the conversation.

But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows, And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented.
Matthew Catholic chapter eleven, Protestant verses sixteen to seventeen,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

[af_vet_1981]

Here is another example