Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

Since the Church in Acts 15 is the same Church offering the Eucharist, clearly, the prohibition on eating blood was understood to refer to things other that the Eucharist.


2,012 posted on 12/18/2014 7:32:13 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1800 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
>>Since the Church in Acts 15 is the same Church offering the Eucharist, clearly, the prohibition on eating blood was understood to refer to things other that the Eucharist.<<

Interesting how the apostles didn't make that distinction but you do.

2,083 posted on 12/19/2014 5:50:50 AM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
Since the Church in Acts 15 is the same Church offering the Eucharist, clearly, the prohibition on eating blood was understood to refer to things other that the Eucharist.

Ha ha!

The 'Eucharist' isn't even MENTIONED in the LETTER!

2,160 posted on 12/19/2014 12:32:59 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2012 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson